EVELYN  TIDMAN Author
  • HOME
  • My Art
  • Over the Sea to Skye
  • Blog
  • ONE SMALL CANDLE
  • GENTLEMAN OF FORTUNE
  • REBELLION
  • FOR THE KING
  • Reviews
  • About Evelyn Tidman
  • Contact Me

HISTORICAL RESEARCH PART 2 – THE PILGRIM FATHERS

8/3/2014

1 Comment

 
Lists! Endless lists! That’s what historical research is all about! And the bigger the cast of characters, the more lists there seem to be.

While researching ONE SMALL CANDLE The Story of William Bradford and the Pilgrim Fathers, I discovered that within the group they were nearly all related by a system of marriage and re-marriage. This created a major research headache for me. I had lists on my walls of family trees with dates and offspring, because the children were often inter-related. I had to remember whose sister was whose wife. I also had to know where they came from, and at what point they joined the story

To begin with in 1608 the Pilgrims were a congregation of Separatists numbering 125  in Scrooby, a village situated at the point where Nottinghamshire met Yorkshire and the Lincolnshire town of Gainsborough was just ten miles east. Their ‘ruling elder’ was Richard Clifton, and John Robinson and William Brewster were also elders. Young William Bradford was in this congregation. Another congregation of Separatists was located in Gainsborough under the pastorship of John Smith.

In the early years of the 17th century, the religious persecution of Separatists was so bad that they lived in constant fear of being arrested, and others of their persuasion in London had been hanged at Tyburn. As a result, they decided to leave England for Holland, which country, unlike England, allowed freedom of worship. The congregation in Gainsborough were the first to move to Holland and they settled in Amsterdam. The Scrooby congregation followed in dribs and drabs in 1607-9 and at first joined themselves to John Smith’s group.

However, there was a huge difference of opinion between the Scrooby elders and John Smith’s idea of scriptural truth, so the Scrooby contingent attached themselves to yet another group of Separatists in Amsterdam called the Ancient Brethren. They did not agree with them either, and there was trouble brewing there when one of the elders was accused of child molestation. In short order, they decamped again and moved to Leyden to form their own group under the leadership of John Robinson, taking quite a few of the Ancient Brethren with them.

By this time, they had mixed with three hundred or more other Separatists. William Bradford later married Dorothy May in1613 whom he had met in Amsterdam, and their son Jonathan was born in 1615. Years later William Bradford married Alice Carpenter in Plymouth, NE, and they too first met in Amsterdam.

The Carpenter family, under the head Alexander, were Separatists from Somerset. After being associated with the second congregation in Amsterdam, they too moved to Leyden. Alice Carpenter (1590-1670) first married Edward Southworth, and had two sons by him, Constant (1615-1679) and Thomas (1616-1669). Her sister Agnes (d. c. 1615) married Samuel Fuller (d.1633) , while another sister, Julianna, married George Morton in 1612 and Manasseh Kempton in 1627 in New England, and Priscilla Carpenter married William Wright (1588-1633 m. in New England in 1627).

The Whites were another large family. Catherine, born 1580 married George Leggatt first, and John Carver secondly (before they ever left England.) The Carvers were passengers on the Mayflower and John became the first governor of the Plymouth Colony. Sadly he died in 1621, and William Bradford became the next governor. The Carvers had two children, but both died in infancy in Leyden.

Catherine’s sister Bridget White married John Robinson the ‘ruling elder’ of the Leyden congregation. John Robinson was the driving force behind the emigration to New England, although he never made the voyage. The White clan included Charles, Thomas, Roger (who married Elizabeth Wales), Edward, Jane, who married Ralph Thickens in Leyden and Frances who married Francis Jessop. Their cousin William White married Susannah Fuller, sister of Edward and Sam Fuller. When he died of the sickness in Plymouth, she married Edward Winslow in May 1621.

If you’ve lost track by this point, then perhaps you can sympathise with me. I have lists of Mayflower passengers, Speedwell passengers, Anne passengers, Little Fortune passengers. Lists of congregation members in Scrooby, in Amsterdam, in Leyden, in London (before they left for America), who died in the sickness of 1620-21, who survived the sickness. You get the picture.

These days, all these lists are available on the internet. In the days when I did my research, there was no internet! Or if there was, I had not discovered it yet. It took me two years to write ONE SMALL CANDLE and I tried to record the events are as accurately as possible. However, my aim was not to make a dry history book. I wanted to discover what drove these people to such desperate lengths, what life must have been like for them.

Within historical information there is always room for interpretation. From the snippets of information available I had to devise personalities for the characters, understand their personal achievements or tragedies. I had to fabricate some conversation—although in some cases fabrication was unnecessary.

ONE SMALL CANDLE is not intended to be a definitive history book. It is intended to give an overall picture of the events, to bring the people to life.

I hope you enjoy it.

1 Comment

The Research behind ONE SMALL CANDLE

6/30/2013

1 Comment

 
Write what you know.


That's the advice given to writers. Well that's fine and dandy if you have an encyclopaedic brain. What if you don't know? What if you want to write about history?


Then you jolly well have to find out! That way the not known becomes the known. That's where research comes in.


I write about actual people and events in history and my books, although novels, are mostly factual. Is that more difficult than writing contemporary fiction? On the one hand, probably, on the other, probably not. To qualify: The contemporary fiction writer has to make up a story, and to tie in all the elements of the story, and not forget what happened on page 29, which might have a bearing on page 150. And it may be that the background to that story needs a bit of research; or perhaps the job of the person, or their hangups, and so on. With the historical novellist, everything has to be researched. Did they use forks in 1620? Or 1720? What did they wear? What were the morals? The manners? The ideas? The political situation? The list is endless. But when writing about actual people and events, the story is already written for you. 


For example, when it came to the Pilgrims in ONE SMALL CANDLE there was a great deal of documentation. William Bradford himself had written an account in Of Plymouth Plantation. Edward Winslow also had written an account, and there was a book called Mourt's Relation thought to have been written by George Morton, or some near relative. These were the people who actually went to Plymouth in the initial migrations. One of William Bradford's descendants wrote an account, as well as a man called Dexter. And there were other books as well as on line sources.


So far so almost easy. Marrying up the different accounts, however, can prove to be a headache. One puts in details another leaves out. And to-ing and fro-ing in the different books to check details is time consuming. 


What details? For one thing, beliefs. Belief was a strong point for the Pilgrims. It was the motivation for the emigration first to Holland and then to New England. So that had to be right. Thankfully, John Robinson, their elder in Leyden was prolific in his writings. Too much so! The library in Norwich had several volumes of his treatises. Sorry - could not wade through that lot, but I got the gist. Readers will not have wanted to wade through lots of dogma, scripture and so on, so I had to pick and choose that which was pertinent to the story, at the same time leaving my own religious views out of it.



Another detail was in family relationships. This one proved to be a real headache. Because they were a congregation, and because they took seriously the Biblical command to 'marry only in the Lord', families intermarried. And when marriage mates died, they married again. So Susanna Fuller, Sam Fuller's sister, married William White first. He was cousin to the Whites, Bridget White being married to John Robinson, and her sister Catherine married (second) John Carver who became the first governor of Plymouth Colony. When William White died, Susanna married Edward Winslow, but she had children who were Whites. Same with the Carpenters - five girls all married and re-married. This pattern was repeated time and again. Keeping tabs on them all, and dates, and how old they were, and when they remarried was a nightmare. Thankfully, there are congregation lists, and family lists.


Then it was who was on the Mayflower, who was on the Speedwell, who went over on the Fortune and so on. Who died, who survived. Again, there are passenger lists, and I am grateful to William Bradford and the others for their careful records.


ONE SMALL CANDLE, therefore, is as accurate as I could make it. Even some of the speech is taken from actual conversations. What I have done is to dramatise it, so that the reader can stand in the shoes of the people and share their experiences, and not read just dry history. There are no invented characters in the book, all are genuine. But I do apologise to any descendants who feel their ancestor's character has been portrayed in a less than favourable light.


I like to bring history alive.
Picture
OUT NOW IN PAPERBACK AND KINDLE


FOR U.S. click here
FOR U.K. click here 
FOR CANADA click here
FOR OTHER COUNTRIES SEE AMAZON

1 Comment

Beliefs of the Pilgrim Fathers

3/26/2013

3 Comments

 
What was it about the Separatists that upset the established church so much? Why were they at odds with the Church of England, and why did the Bishops hate them? What exactly were their beliefs?

There were many points of disagreement between the Separatists and the church, and these differences of opinion made it almost impossible for the Separatists to get the necessary legal patents for them to settle in America.

One that struck at the heart of the bishops, challenging their authority, was church government. The Church of England inherited an episcopacy from Roman Catholicism, that is rule by a hierarchy of priests, including bishops. The church also assumed that everyone in England should worship according to Church of England ideas, thus everyone came under the authority of the church. Add to this the idea that the King ruled by divine right, and that he was head of the church and you begin to have a powerful hierarchy. So much so, that the church even had ecclesiastical courts which had the power to send a person to prison or, worse, to have them executed. Everyone in the hierarchy had power, and power brought in money, of course, through tithes (giving a tenth of one's income to the church) and bishops especially lived (and still do) in sumptuous palaces and wore beautiful robes.

The Separatists saw things very differently. They did not acknowledge the right of the church to dictate what they could or could not do. Surely, they reasoned, how a man worshiped was up to his conscience. Furthermore, their reading of the Bible did not include bishops, or even priests. Jesus was the great High Priest and the intermediary between God and man, making a priesthood unnecessary. Rather, like other groups at the time, they believed a congregation should be run by elders (Greek: Presbyters from which we get the word Presbytarian - rule by elders). Elders were not ordained, but had the job of teaching and the pastoral care of the congregation. More to the point, just as the Apostle Paul had provided for himself by working as a tentmaker, so elders were not to expect payment for their services. (Acts 18:3; 20:34,35) 

To the bishops and the King, this form of church government challenged their very authority. Needless to say the Separatists were the most hated group. Even the puritans did not challenge church authority in quite the same way. When the Separatists tried to get a patent to settle in Virginia, this point was argued over in great detail by the King and the bishops. They still wanted complete control in America!

The other great cause of disagreement was the trinity doctrine held so dearly by the Catholic Church and inherited by the Church of England. This is the belief that God is God, Jesus is God and HolySpirit is God, but there are not three Gods, but one, the three-in-one doctrine. This was, and still is a central doctrine in the Church of England, as well as Catholicism and other Christian religions. The Separatists on the other hand did not believe in a trinity.

Now that people had the Bible in English they could search the scriptures for themselves (see previous blog). One of the things they discovered was that Almighty God had a personal name. In English, that name is translated as Jehovah, and that name was found in the Geneva Bible and the Authorised Version (authorised by the same King James I) at Psalm 83 verse 18. To the Separatists it was obvious that if God's name was Jehovah and Jesus' name was - well - Jesus, they could not be the same person. Rather, Jesus was God's Son. They used the name Jehovah freely in speech and in worship.

The problem with that was that the King, James I, who had leanings towards Catholicism, and the bishops believed in a trinity. If a person disagreed with the King that was treason, and therefore punishable by death! 

No wonder the Separatists left England!

There were other causes of disagreement. More about that another time.
Picture
ONE SMALL CANDLE
The Story of William Bradford and the Pilgrim Fathers

OUT NOW

E books:
US: http://amzn.to/ZWygLn
UK: http://amzn.to/ZhCAE3



3 Comments

Religious Persecution in the Seventeenth Century

3/13/2013

2 Comments

 
Whilst more tolerant than Catholic Spain, the English in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries had their own religious difficulties to deal with. Persecution was the reason why the Separatists left England in 1607-1609, an act which later propelled them to set up the colony in New England, and Catholics too left to colonise Virginia. But what led to the persecution? Everyone knows who Catholics are, but who were the Separatists?

The root lies in the translation of the Bible into the vernacular languages of the day. Originally written in Hebrew for the Old Testament (with a smattering of Aramaic) and Greek for the New, translation became necessary for the scriptures to reach a wider audience. Indeed, the first translation of the scriptures was of portions of the Old Testament into Greek, this before the birth of Jesus Christ. The reason was that Greek had become the common language through the empire built by Alexander the Great. In the time of the Roman empire, however, and round about the end of the first century, Latin had taken over as the common language of the people. So the scriptures were translated into Latin. Actually there were several Latin translations, but the most widely used came to be called the Latin Vulgate, because it was common, or vulgar Latin.

However, as time went on and language changed again, and people began to speak English and French and German, you would think that the scriptures would again be translated into those languages. But the Catholic Church, which had risen in the fourth century CE refused to sanction the translation. For example, in 1199 Pope Innocent III condemned French translations of the Psalms, the gospels and the letters of the Apostle Paul. Cistercian monks burned any copies that they found. In 1229: “We forbid the laity to have in their possession any copy of the books of the Old and New Testament, except the Psalter, and such portions of them as are contained in the Breviary, or the Hours of the Blessed Virgin; and we most strictly forbid even these works in the vulgar tongue.” - Council of Toulouse, France, Canon 14.
It was deemed that people would 'become confused' by reading the Bible for themselves. So for centuries the Bible stayed in Latin, and only those versed in that language could read it at all. For the most part that was priests and monks and those schooled by them. It meant that common people had to accept what they were told by the priests, whether right or wrong. The Church had complete control.

When we come to the Middle Ages a few brave souls, scholars, sought to translate the Bible into different languages. John Wycliffe, Miles Coverdale and William Tyndale were among those translating into English, while on the Continent other scholars worked on vernacular translations. William Tyndale famously said to a priest: "If God spare my life, ere many years I will cause a boy that driveth the plough shall know more of the scripture than thou dost.” But Tyndale was persecuted. He fled to the Continent, but was denounced by a priest, and brought back to England where he was burned at the stake for heresy (after being strangled first) in 1536. His last words were: 'Lord, open the King of England's eyes.' So great was the opposition to Tyndale's translation of the Bible that very few copies remain - in the British Museum there are just a few pages.

Nevertheless, the cat was out of the bag. As people read the scriptures for themselves, they could see that what they had been taught was in error. Famously on October 31, 1517 Martin Luther had nailed his theses to the door of the castle church at Wittenberg, Saxony protesting at the sale of indulgences, kick-starting the Reformation. While Henry VIII was on the throne, the Reformation gathered pace. Ideas began to flow freely, although the Church did its best to stifle it. Religion was the most hotly debated topic in the taverns and any meeting places. Subjects such as Predestination, should there be clergy? Who was God? and so on were matters of great concern. Then Henry VIII famously took England out of the grip of Rome, became head of the English Church and dissolved all the monasteries. The Reformation gathered pace.

When Henry's daughter Mary Tudor succeeded her brother Edward VI to the throne, however, she tried to force England back to Rome. Known as Bloody Mary for her Inquisitional ideas of burning people at the stake for 'heresy', under her rule terror reigned in Britain. But her successor Elizabeth turned the tables and Britain was once again free of Rome.

The more people read the Bible, the more they wanted change. The Church of England, in the view of many, did not go far enough. They were episcopalian, that is, their hierarchy consisted of priests. The Presbyterians, however, had church government by elders, or presbyters, because they said that there was only one high priest - Jesus. The Puritans wanted to change the Church of England, and worked from within the church to change it. The Separatists decided that was a bad idea, and the Church wouldn't change anyway, so they - well - separated. 

From this confusion, came other groups. The Methodists, the Quakers, the Mennonites, the Baptists, Congregationalists and so on. All of them were looking at the scriptures, and deciding that their contemporaries were wrong, and that they were right. Tracts and books and booklets flowed off the different presses, as different scholars put their views and counterviews for one argument or another. All were looking for truth, but the truth was still very difficult to find.

In the middle of all this, the Church of England, by now the Established Church with the sovereign firmly planted at its head, wanted to keep a grip on things. The bishops advised King James I as to doctrine. He had been brought up in Scotland, and his mother was Mary Queen of Scots, beheaded on Elizabeth's orders or course, and she had been staunchly Catholic. This upbringing had an influence on James who leaned towards Catholicism. 

With all this religious confusion, James needed to solidify his domain. Laws were brought in. Every person in England was required to go to their parish church on a Sunday or be liable to the Ecclesiastical court. Well that was fine and dandy if you were an Anglican, but if you did not agree with that, and the Separatists did not, then immediately you were in trouble. And the penalties could be severe - imprisonment or even execution. The Separatists found themselves spied on. Meetings were raided, as were homes. Worse, if you dared to disagree with the Church on doctrine, you disagreed with the King, for he was head of the Church. And that was treason. And treason brought the death penalty. 

The only way the Separatists could actually do their own thing was to leave England. But that required permission from the King, and that was not going to happen. The King and church, strangely, did not want them to leave. Why not? From the point of view of the King and the Anglican Church it would be better to persuade the dissidents to come back to the church rather than for them to go away and continue in their 'error'. So they were denied permission. But they did leave, clandestinely, and sailed for Holland, which country allowed freedom of worship.

Later, when it came to going to America, they again had to get a patent from the King. And again they ran into this opposition. He questioned their representative closely on their beliefs, church government, and particularly whether they believed in a Trinity. The idea of the Trinity was a sticky subject. (The Trinity doctrine is the idea that God is God, Jesus is God and the Holy Spirit is God, but there are not three gods, only one, the three-in-one doctrine.) The Separatists (and others) did not believe a Trinity, viewing it as unscriptural. But to say so was treason and punishable by death. They hedged and demurred, but at last they got their patent. But it was touch and go.

Of course, the Reformation eventually brought the English Civil War, with Puritans against the Royalists, although there were many political issues involved. And since then there has been little major religious persecution, most of the English thinking that how the other bloke worships is his own business, although certain groups have suffered on a personal level in England.

Of the Pilgrims, when they arrived in America, they drew up the Mayflower Compact which guaranteed freedom of worship, and on which the American Constitution is based. They certainly did not want a repeat performance of the atrocities carried out in the name of religion in England. 
2 Comments

 The Pilgrim Fathers 

2/24/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture
My painting of a Pilgrim
Everyone knows the story of the Pilgrim Fathers, how a group of religiously persecuted individuals made the hazardous crossing from England to New England on the Mayflower to found a nation. But what exactly was it all about? Who were the Pilgrims? What made them move first from England to Holland, and then to America?

These questions prompted me to research the subject and write a novel based on that research. The book, ONE SMALL CANDLE The Story of William Bradford and the Pilgrim Fathers will be published soon.

Picture
Cover by LLPix Photography
William Bradford was a young man when he left England with the Separatist congregation to move to the Low Countries, or, as we would call it, Holland. The congregation settled eventually in Leyden, but struggling to make a living there, and beset with other difficulties they decided to move lock, stock and barrel to America.

However, the best laid plans never come to pass, as they say.

Right from the start they struggled to get a patent to settle in America because of opposition to their faith. The voyage itself was plagued by difficulties and then sickness. But as we all know, a few of the Separatists made it to Plymouth, New England where they began the struggle to build a colony. William Bradford as the governor of that new colony, was their strength and it was he (with God's help, he would have said) who helped them to survive.

Looking for the chief protagonist in the story, one who followed through from beginning to end, William Bradford seemed to me to be the obvious choice. He was young, only thirty in 1620, but also, according to historians, he had a forbidden love story. I'm not giving anything more away about that, but it brought out the human side of the man. 

The Separatist colony at Plymouth became the spark that started a nation, the most powerful nation on earth. To sum up, let William Bradford himself have the final say:

Thus out of small beginnings greater things have been produced by his hand that made all things of nothing, and gives being to all things that are; and as one small candle may light a thousand, so the light here kindled hath shone to many, yea in some sort to our whole nation; let the glorious name of Jehovah have all the praise.--William Bradford


0 Comments

    Author

    Evelyn Tidman, the author of REBELLION, Roger L'Estrange and the Kent Petition, the second in the Roger L'Estrange series; FOR THE KING, Roger L'Estrange and the Siege of King's Lynn, the first in the Roger L'Estrange series based on a true story of the English Civil War, GENTLEMAN OF FORTUNE, The Adventures of Bartholomew Roberts, Pirate. a historical swashbuckling romance; and ONE SMALL CANDLE The Story of William Bradford and the Pilgrim Fathers.  All based on true stories.

    Archives

    September 2016
    August 2016
    May 2016
    February 2016
    October 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    September 2013
    June 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013

    Categories

    All
    Beliefs Of The Pilgrim Fathers
    Pilgrim Fathers
    Pirates
    Pirates' Articles
    Swearing
    Why Bart Roberts

    RSS Feed

    Historical Fiction News - Sign up for our newsletter

    * indicates required
    Picture
    OUT NOW!
    Kindle and print 

    Through Amazon (click to view)
    Picture
    KINDLE AND PAPERBACK
    through Amazon (click to buy)

    Picture
    KINDLE AND PAPERBACK
    through Amazon (click to buy)
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.